ROMANS
CHAPTER 3
God's Faithfulness
This has been said to be one of the most
difficult texts in all of Scripture. I am grateful for the preachers
and commentators who have led me to a sound and solid understanding
of it. Notice several points in these verses:
First, the Jews will say, “If physical circumcision is meaningless
apart from spiritual circumcision, then you’re saying it’s worthless
to be a Jew, you’re saying it’s unimportant to be part of the covenant
people, and you would ultimately be saying that the God Who instituted
the covenant and the covenant sign is silly.” The Jews are asking,
“What’s the purpose of physical circumcision and being a Jew, if all
that matters is the spiritual, inward circumcision?” And Paul says,
“There are many advantages!” Then he gives just one: the Jews have
been entrusted with the Holy Scriptures. God has entrusted the
knowledge of Himself uniquely revealed in the Bible. Everybody
in the world has God’s image written on their very being. They bear
the image of God. Everybody in the world knows the law of God, and
they know that God ought to be worshiped. But because of sin they
suppress that, and God has revealed Himself uniquely to Israel. Notice
that Paul gives no other benefits, despite his use of “First of all…”
Actually, Paul does come back in Romans 9:4-5 to give several more
benefits of being a Jew. “Theirs is the adoption as sons; theirs the
divine glory, the covenants, the receiving of the law, the temple
worship and the promises. Theirs are the patriarchs, and from them
is traced the human ancestry of Christ.” So Paul is just bringing
up this objection as a preview to this whole problem of whether God
is being faithful to His covenant with Israel in the work of Christ.
Now, Paul is pointing out that the promise God gives to Abraham is of
ultimate value, and the sign of the promise is not. But for the promise
to be embraced there must be an inward reality, and the outward sign
is supposed to be a sign of embracing the promise inwardly. So, as
Paul presupposes the importance of Scripture’s existence, he shows
the Jews that they have been entrusted to have the revelation of God.
Here’s an analogy: Assume that there was one school in the world that
could teach you the secret of knowing God. Entrance into that school
was by invitation of God only. But the children of those who had been
first invited were automatically invited and enrolled to enter that
school as well. That school was located in one nation, not in many,
but in one nation. Those who go through that school are uniquely
exposed to the knowledge of God and how to live with Him, relate
to Him, worship and serve Him forever. However, going to that school
does not necessarily guarantee that you will, in fact, worship and
serve Him forever. Here’s the question: Is it an advantage to be
invited to that school? Is it an advantage to be a child of someone
who has been invited to that school? You’d better believe it! Of
course, it’s an advantage, an incredible one! There’s nothing like
it in the world. That’s what Paul says first. And second…
Paul says that it is impossible for God to be unfaithful. He quotes
Psalm 51, King David’s confession after his adultery with Bathsheba.
David said, “Against You, You only, have I sinned and done what is
evil in Your sight, so that You are proved right when You speak and
justified when You judge” (51:4). In other words, David says that God
would be just to judge him. David’s sin against God makes God’s judgment
of David righteous—it is true to God’s nature, it is true to His glory,
and so this righteousness is faithfulness to His covenant. David
himself, the hero of the Jews, said that God would be right to judge
him. See, what these Jews forgot is that there are two ways for God
to be faithful in response to the giving of the covenant sign to the
covenant community. He can be faithful in blessing as we trust and
obey, or He can be faithful in wrath if we reject those promises and
live apart from His word and His law. God’s faithfulness should cause
unbelievers to tremble, because He will judge in wrath. God’s
faithfulness should cause believers great joy, because He will glorify
us in eternal life. Either way, God is faithful. The question Paul
could have asked the Jews is, “Are you?”
The covenant sign itself, though it entails privileges, also entails
responsibilities. And when the covenant promise is rejected, or
neglected, or taken for granted, then God’s wrath is justly visited.
And He is not being unfaithful. God is faithful in blessing or in
judgment if the responsibilities that accompany the covenant are
fulfilled or neglected.
Again, we get Paul’s famous, “God forbid!” This time our NIV is,
“Certainly Not!” God is never unrighteous! Paul rejects outright
the suggestion that it is unjust for God to judge those who have
sinned, even though in His judgment, His faithfulness is declared
and His glory is magnified.
Paul says that the God of the Bible is beyond questioning in the
righteousness of His just judgment. God is a just judge. Now, he’s
speaking to Jewish people who believe in God’s judgment, and they
believe in a final judgment. And perhaps he’s saying to them, “Look,
if you think that God might be unjust in His judgment now, how can
you think that He’s going to be just in His final judgment, which
we all agree is going to occur?” Or Paul may be saying something
like this, “If you are saying that sin ceases to be sin and ceases
to require judgment, because God overrules it for His glory, then
there’s no sin that can be punished, because God overrules every
sin for His glory.” The Jews thought it was right to punish a sinner,
so this view doesn’t mesh with the position that Paul knew they held.
And if they were going to argue that way, then they would have to say
that no sin can be judged.
Notice how, when faced with the judgment of God for sin, these people
immediately want to ask the abstract question, “Is it right for God to
judge?” rather than the obvious and concrete question, “How do I deal
with the fact that I‘m a sinner and I deserve judgment?” They would
rather go to some sort of abstract theological question which is
frankly preposterous; the idea that God’s judgment is unjust, than
deal with the fact which is close at home that they are sinners in
need of God’s divine mercy. And so often when we’re in gospel
conversations we run into that very thing. Perhaps you confront
someone with their sin, and suddenly they have all these intricate
theological questions that they want you to answer. “Well, before
we get to that, I’ve got some questions about angels that I need you
to straighten out. Or help me with predestination, I don’t understand
that. Or how do you know God exists?” Suddenly, there’s this great
interest in various speculative theological issues. Why? Because,
you’re getting close to home. You’re dealing with sin. And sin can
accept anything except repentance. It will do anything to stay alive.
And so the favorite thing to do for the unrepentant unbeliever is to
run away from the accusation of sin and go to some abstract theological
question.
When the homosexuality thing came up in the Episcopalian church a
couple years ago, I remember seeing on local television, an interview
with a lady who attended a special meeting at one of the local churches
saying, “Jesus never said anything against homosexuals. Paul may have,
and Moses may have written some stuff in the Old Testament, but Jesus
never did, and that’s all that matters.” How wrong is that? Can you
place a higher value on Leviticus chapter 17 than on Romans chapter
1? It’s all infallible, inerrant, and inspired. This kind of “Jesus
didn’t say it” tactic ignores Paul’s claims of being an apostle, of
having authority to direct the churches, and it ignores what Scripture
says about being all-inspired. It also contradicts what Jesus said
about Scripture and tries to separate Jesus and Paul. The teachings
of Jesus and Paul are practically synonymous, and when people try to
separate their doctrine, they undermine the value of Scripture. You
know, as Christians, our view of Scripture as Holy is devotion and
worship. We show God that we love His Word by upholding the value of
it. And this type of argument makes that Word look self-contradictory
and ridiculous. It’s sad.
Here’s what Paul is saying: If you can face God’s judgment apart from
Christ, apart from grace, apart from mercy, and apart from the gospel
in your own righteousness, go ahead and do it, because God is just,
and if you are righteous, I promise you He will acquit you. Now, you
might be acquitted from punishment, but you have only done your duty,
so you wouldn’t merit eternal life and glory. That’s another topic for
another day, but that’s what Paul is saying. The gospel is for everyone.
Without it, none will be saved.
We see again the repeated tendency to change the subject: Jesus ran
into this kind of thing at the woman at the well. He’s talking with
this woman about a sin that is very, very close to the center of her
heart when he says to her, “Woman, go bring your husband.” She says,
“Well, I have no husband.” And He says, “You’re right. The man that
you’re living with is not your husband, and you’ve had five
previously.” And immediately she becomes interested in having a
theological discussion about worship. “Well, let’s talk about the
theories of appropriate worship. It is here in Samaria or is it in
Jerusalem?” Immediately she wants to talk about something else. Have
you ever experienced this type of thing?
So the Jews have said, “God can’t judge those whose sin magnifies His
righteousness when He judges them, and therefore, we may as well all
just go on sinning.” Because Paul’s whole point is that their sin
glorifies God’s righteousness in judgment, they tried to convince
themselves that they were not really sinners but God-glorifiers,
and therefore safe from His wrath. And Paul, to that kind of
convoluted, weaseling use of language and theology, says, “Their
condemnation is just.” On the one hand, God is faithful and righteous
and true to His glory, and on the other hand, God judges His very own
chosen people and condemns them along with the Gentile world: Two
truths, for them irreconcilable. So they try to reject one of these
truths. And the result is sophistry—tricky reasoning, word games.
Today we might call it spinning. Ever watch O’Reilly and the No Spin
Zone? Paul treats this ridiculous, yet prominent theological objection
elsewhere in Romans, under different contexts, so we’ll look more at
it then.
No One is Righteous
Sin is mainly a condition of rebellion against God. This is why it
is so sad and pointless when people argue that they are pretty good
people and don’t need the Gospel. What they mean is that they treat
other people decently: they don’t steal, kill, lie or swear too much,
and, oh yeah, they give money to some charities. But that is not the
main question. The main question is: Do they love God with all their
heart and soul and mind and strength? Do they love His Son, Jesus
Christ? Is God the most important Person? It is not virtuous to do
nice things for people while having no love or reverence or passion
for God. Sin is, first and foremost, a resistance to God. And that
resistance results in a darkened mind that then suppresses the truth
and does not understand God. So the person “under sin” does not seek
God and does not know God and does not fear God.
One of the most important truths to hold up in the world is that all
human beings, even though created in God’s image, are corrupted by
the power of sin. We are not morally good by nature. We are by nature
morally bad. In Ephesians 2:3, Paul says we are all “by nature children
of wrath.” The attitudes and thoughts and actions that deserve the
wrath of God come from us in and by our nature. We see it again from
Paul in Colossians 3:5-7. “Put to death, therefore, whatever belongs
to your earthly nature: sexual immorality, impurity, lust, evil desires
and greed, which is idolatry. Because of these, the wrath of God is
coming [against the sons of disobedience]. You used to walk in these
ways, in the life you once lived.” Plain and simply put, we are by
nature sinful. Sin is like a master or a king, and it reigns over us
and in us. Not that it coerces us to do what we don’t want to do, but
it makes us want to do what we ought not to do. We are not innocent
victims of sin. We are co-conspirators with sin against God. Let’s
see Paul’s point through 6 Old Testament passages:
There is no one who seeks God. Now this is hard to grasp in our day
and age of seeker-sensitive church movements. But what Paul is
saying here is that no one desires the One, True God. He’s too
demanding, He’s too Holy, He’s a consuming fire that will undo us
at His presence. Remember what Job said after being confronted by
God? “I am unworthy—how can I reply to You? I put my hand over my
mouth. I have no answer; I will say no more….I despise myself and
repent in dust and ashes.” Look what happened to Isaiah when he was
brought into the presence of God. He was undone, literally turned
inside out and cut open at the sight of the Theophany. Look what
happened when Peter was confronted by Jesus Christ while fishing
in Luke 5. He was convicted that Jesus was more than a mere man,
and he said, “Go away. I am sinful.” Look again in Luke 8 when Jesus
calmed the sea. Those with Him were filled with “fear and amazement.”
“Who is this?” they asked. So no one, with the exception of those
already believers, desires our God. Isaiah 53:2-3 “He had no beauty
or majesty to attract us to Him; there was nothing in His appearance
that we should desire Him; He was despised and rejected, like one
from whom we would hide our faces; He was despised, and we esteemed
Him not.”
Unbelievers do not seek this God. Paul makes that very clear. We do
not become God-seekers until we are found by Him. Once we are made
believers, then it is true that we seek Him. He has made us willing,
and because of that, we want Him; we desire Him. Because we have been
changed, we do good; but still, even then, it is God Who works in us.
I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. So it’s God working through
us. It’s never just us. Paul concludes this point: All have turned
away and become worthless; no one does good, not even one. We must
understand this to properly understand grace. There is nothing valuable
in me. I contribute nothing to the equation of salvation. It’s all of
grace. It has nothing to do with me. These are hard words to hear, but
that’s exactly what Paul has been saying since Romans 1:18.
Sure, we may have feared judgment, but we certainly didn’t
understand it. We were impious and ungodly, just as all unbelievers
are. So having demonstrated from our impiety, from our deeds, from
our words, and from our hearts how sinful mankind is, Paul has set
us up to embrace the only way out of this mess—Jesus Christ. And
those of us who are already saved can better appreciate God and
what He has done to save us from the power of sin. We can rejoice
in the good news that there is righteousness that reconciles us to
God that comes from outside of us. We don’t produce it or even
contribute to it, all we do is receive it and rest on it by faith.
That is the greatest news ever heard.
If the Jews were held silent, having possessed the law, Paul says then
“every mouth may be silenced and the whole world held accountable to
God.” After the Jews’ mouths are closed before God, there is utter
silence in His presence. No one says a word before God’s Judge’s bench.
There will be no plea bargaining, no excuses, no reasons. The Gentiles
have nothing to say, because in spite of overwhelming evidence, they
persistently suppress the truth in their unrighteousness. The Jews,
who were as a nation brought into covenant with Him were given the
law, but that law condemns their sinfulness at every turn.
Paul is explaining one purpose of the law. He has already said that
the Jews misunderstood its purpose (it was not intended to justify),
so now he’s telling them what one purpose of the law actually is: To
silence mankind before God, to show mankind the heinousness of sin
and its debilitating effects on the totality of man’s being. More
than that—the Jews were guilty of applying the law to the Gentile
converts to Judaism without applying it to themselves, so Paul
corrected them and made sure that they remembered to apply to
themselves as well. We must do the same. We can’t use the law just
to condemn the sin in others. It condemns us as well. It silences
others before God, and it silences us as well.
Paul wanted to show that the Holy Scriptures actually accomplish
their purpose. Isaiah 55:11 “My Word that goes out from My mouth
will not return to Me empty, but will accomplish what I desire
and achieve the purpose for which I sent it.” One purpose of the
Word of God is to show that all of mankind is accountable to God
for their sin, to silence mankind before the judgment of God. The
purpose of the Word was never to make man righteous, never to
justify him. Jeremiah 23:29 “Is not My Word like fire, declares
the LORD, and like a hammer that breaks a rock in pieces?” Do we
believe that? Hebrews 4:12 “The Word of God is living and active.
Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing
soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and
attitudes of the heart” The Word is powerful unto judgment. Do we
consider the Word like that? Paul knows that as we read the
Scriptures, we must understand our own sin.
Romans 1:20 showed us that we know God through creation. Romans
2:15 showed us that we know the law as it is written on our
consciences, our hearts. And now in Romans 3:19, we are shown
that we know these things also because of the nation of Israel.
If the Jews, who had the blessings of God to succeed, failed,
then we certainly have too. So Paul says that the proper understanding
for someone in the sphere of the law, who has heard the law and been
presented the law, who knows the judgments of the law, is to recognize
his or her sinfulness and need of grace, because all are
accountable.
Paul concludes with something that would have been very shocking to
his Jewish friends. At the very end of verse 20 he says, “For
through the law comes the knowledge of sin.” Now that would have
greatly irritated a pious Jew. A pious Jew would have said, “What
do you mean that through the Scripture comes knowledge of sin?
Through the Scripture comes the knowledge of the great and holy
and awesome God.” Well, Paul is saying this provocatively. Paul
isn’t trying to tell everything that the law is and does in this
passage. But he is telling this. Think about it. The law itself
in our fallen condition, as we are already sinners, shows us our
need of grace. Far from putting us right with God, the law shows
that we are wrong with God; we need to be put right with God, but
that we can’t put ourselves right. Therefore the law itself functions
to reveal to us our sin, to convince us of our sin, and to show us
that we need an escape from sin which we can’t provide.
We can see from Romans 7:7-8 what Paul is saying: “What shall we
say then? Is the Law sin? May it never be! On the contrary, I would
not have come to know sin except through the Law [Here is what
Romans 3:20b means—the Law brings about the knowledge of sin]; for
I would not have known about coveting if the Law had not said,
‘You shall not covet.’ But sin, taking opportunity through the
commandment, produced in me coveting of every kind; for apart
from the Law sin is dead.” That is, sin lies unrecognized. When
the Law meets an unregenerate heart, a person without the Holy
Spirit and without faith, the effect is that it reveals the rebellion
in our hearts; it makes our rebellion against God and his Law known;
it brings it out. Sin rises up in the presence of the Law and shows
itself with vivid colors. John Piper offers this analogy: It’s like
a teenager who goes to the mailbox to get the mail. He brings it in
and puts it on the table. He flips through it and sees nothing for
him, and so he starts to walk away. No bad desires at all here, right?
But then he notices at the top of one of the postcards the words, “For
parents only!” And suddenly there is a desire to read the card. Are
those words on the card sin? No. But through those words come the
knowledge of sin. Suddenly what was lying dormant in the heart is
shown to really be there—the desire to read what one ought not to
read.
Paul’s question to us is this: “What stands you before God? What
makes you secure before the God of the universe?” And his answer
is, “The righteousness of God. That’s what stands.” But, you see,
that brings another crisis. The response is: “Well, I’m not the
righteousness of God. My life condemns me if that’s the standard.
Where do I get this?” And Paul says, “Well, that’s where I wanted
you to be in the first place. Because until you understand that
you need the righteousness of God, before you stand before the
awesome and Holy God, you’re not ready to hear the good news that
I’ve wanted to tell you.” But we have to wait until next time to
see the great turning point, which comes in v.21-22. And for the
rest of this book, Paul is going to tell us just how glorious that
good news is. But it will make no sense to us, until we first
acknowledge our need of that good news. Until we’re honest with
ourselves, and we run from our deeds, good and bad, to the one
place where we can find the righteousness of God, and that’s in
Jesus Christ as is offered in the gospel.
Righteousness Through Faith
We change subjects within Paul’s letter tonight, as we look at verses
21-31 of chapter 3. Remember, Paul spent the past 63 verses, from
Romans 1:18-3:20, talking about the bad news, the sinfulness of
mankind. Now, for the first time since verse 17 of chapter 1,
Paul returns to the topic he introduced in his thesis: a
righteousness from God revealed in the gospel.
What is grace? It’s more than “unmerited favor.” It’s not only that
we didn’t deserve favor. It’s that we deserved eternal damnation.
So God’s grace is more than, “God forgives us.” God’s grace is His
favor freely bestowed on those who deserve His condemnation at the
cost of His Son. G.R.A.C.E. = God’s Riches at Christ’s Expense
The words “But now” declare the change that took place when we went
from “under wrath” to “under grace.” We were not “in Christ,” but now
we are. We were lost but now are found. The words “But now” also are
used by Paul, I think, to remind us of the work of God in history.
Before Christ, everything was B.C., and now, after Christ, everything
is A.D., the Year of Our Lord… Paul makes a temporal distinction
between what God had been doing in preparation for the fullness of
time in the days of the old covenant, and the fulfillment of those
old covenant promises and prophesies and types as represented by Christ
and the new covenant. The old covenant was then…But now we have the
new covenant. It is finished.
Second, Paul says that God’s righteousness has been revealed “apart
from the law,” apart from our works of the law, apart from our doing
anything, apart from our obedience. Paul is saying that God’s
righteousness is displayed in us in such a way that nothing we do
contributes to it. There is absolutely nothing we bring to this
display of God’s righteousness. It is an alien righteousness, provided
by God, and received by the channel of faith. It is not something in
us or from us.
Third and finally in this verse, Paul is telling us that he is not
giving us a new teaching, but that this truth of the gospel and
justification by faith is demonstrated in the Old Testament itself.
The Old Testament clearly witnesses to it and testifies of the truth
of the gospel and justification by faith. In fact, in Romans 4, the
place that Paul will go to show the proof of the gospel from Scripture
is from Genesis and the story of Abraham. You know, often times we ask
this question, “Salvation is by grace through faith in the New
Testament, but was it the same way in the Old Testament?” Paul would
have never asked that question. He might have asked, “Salvation is by
grace through faith in the Scriptures (the Old Testament), but is it
still that way since the Messiah has completed His work (in the New
Testament)?” Paul knew that the gospel of salvation by grace through
faith alone was both old covenant and new covenant reality. In the
old covenant, people had to look forward to the coming promised
Messiah; in the new covenant, people have the completed glory of Jesus
Christ.
Remember the analogy of the pardon that we discussed awhile back.
The pardon is freely offered and must be accepted by the guilty
party. That’s true. But regarding the righteousness of the state,
in this case, God, the punishment for the sin was already carried
out in the Person of Jesus Christ; thus God will not and cannot
righteously demand that punishment from the guilty party. Do you
understand the critical implications of this, especially considering
the substitionary atonement of Christ? If Christ paid the punishment
price of someone’s sins, then God would be unrighteous, unjust,
to also punish the sinner for those sins that were punished in Christ.
Do you see? Justification is about what God does, not you.
Finally notice that justification, though free, is in fact, very
costly. Justification is free to us, but it’s costly to God. Paul
says that it is a gift by grace, but it is purchased for us through
the redemption in Jesus. Christ has paid a purchase price for us. He
bought us from God for God—from God’s wrath for God’s mercy. He paid
by His life with His blood, bearing the penalty of sin, a purchase
price. Will this price not buy what it was intended to purchase?
As Paul would say, “God forbid!” Jesus has effectively accomplished
exactly what He intended. So what was His purpose? Was it to merely
offer salvation to all of mankind, and thereby require mankind to be
the ultimate determiner of salvation? Was it actually save the elect?
I, and Scripture I believe, suggest that Christ has fulfilled His
purpose, to redeem those the Father gave Him. And it wasn’t everybody.
I’m sure not all of you agree. In fact, perhaps most of you disagree.
How does what I’ve said make you feel? Did Christ fail in His efforts
to purchase all of mankind? Or did He succeed in redeeming all those
the Father gave Him? Do you see where this understanding, in order for
us to be consistent in our doctrinal theology, is so critical? This is
why the Calvinism / Arminianism debate is so important. It doesn’t
determine whether or not you’re saved. Rather, it forces us to examine
our theological consistency.
Jesus was a substitionary, atoning, propitiatory sacrifice. We don’t
use words like “justification,” “redemption,” “propitiation,”
“atonement,” or “substitionary” very much. And it’s a shame,
because all of these words are very important. Understanding their
Scriptural meaning correctly is critical for having a consistent
theology. We’ve already discussed “justification.” It means to declare
righteous what is not.
“Redemption” speaks of purchasing back something that was in bondage,
a prisoner of war or a slave. Redemption is like a ransom. Redeem
means to set-free or release at a price. “Propitiation” means a
“wrath-removing;” it speaks of turning away a deserved wrath. It
means to pacify or appease or satisfy. “Atonement” (often considered
as “at-one-ment”) means to extinguish guilt, to make amends for
wrongdoing so that oneness and unity is accomplished or restored.
It is reconciliation; and we can’t reconcile ourselves to God. We
can’t atone for our own sins. We have nothing of atoning value to
offer God that would reconcile us to Him. But Christ did. He had
the blood of a perfect, sinless life.
See Hebrews 9:12-15,22,25-28; 10:4. “[Christ] did not enter by means
of the blood of goats and calves; but He entered the Most Holy Place
once for all by His own blood, having obtained eternal redemption.
The blood of [animals] sprinkled on those who are ceremonially unclean
sanctify them so that they are outwardly clean. How much more, then,
will the blood of Christ, Who through the eternal Spirit offered
Himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from acts that
lead to death, so that we may serve the living God! For this reason
Christ is the mediator of a new covenant, that those who are called
may receive the promised eternal inheritance—now that He has died as
a ransom to set them free from the sins committed under the first
covenant…Without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness… Nor
did He enter heaven to offer Himself again and again, the way the
high priest enters the Most Holy Place every year with blood that
is not his own. Then Christ would have had to suffer many times since
the creation of the world. But now He has appeared once for all at
the end of the ages to do away with sin by the sacrifice of Himself.
Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment,
so Christ was sacrificed once to take away the sins of many people;
and He will appear a second time, not to bear sin, but to bring
salvation to those who are waiting for Him… It is impossible for the
blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.”
When we speak of a “substitutionary” atonement, we mean that Christ
reconciled those for whom He died to the Father. Christ substituted
Himself for them. Will this not be honored by God? 2 Corinthians
5:17-19 “Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation;
the old has gone, the new has come! All this is from God, Who
reconciled us to Himself through Christ and gave us the ministry
of reconciliation: that God was reconciling the world to Himself
in Christ, not counting men’s sins against them.” All of these words
bring freedom in the Christian life. Do you have guilt? Here’s
justification. Are you bound to addictions? Here’s redemption. Do you
fear the wrath of God? Here’s propitiation. All of these are freely
offered, and I suggest applied, in the gospel, because Christ is a
substitutionary atoning sacrifice.
Justification shows us how God’s mercy is grounded in justice and
righteousness. Justification doesn’t compromise His justice or His
mercy; it exalts both. Any presentation of the gospel that denies
either God’s justice or His mercy is not the gospel. Both of those
components must be present in a true presentation of the gospel.
That’s the glory of the gospel; it doesn’t compromise the character
of God. That’s what makes God both just and the One Who justifies.
And who does He justify? The believer is justified, the one who has
faith. All those things we talked about—justification, redemption,
propitiation, atonement, and substitution—all those things are
transferred through the channel of faith.
It’s important to understand that justification has to do with God,
not the guilty party. It’s not in the hands of the guilty party to
be made just or not. It’s in the hands of the judge. God is the judge,
the One Who justifies. And if He justifies someone in His High and
Supreme Court, He cannot righteously require a penalty from that person
who has been made just. Remember Roman 8:29-30: Those who are justified
are also glorified. There’s no turning back. And this gives great
assurance of salvation to the believer.
God’s righteousness and justice was at stake in justification. God would
have been unrighteous if He passed over sin without saving us in a way
that demonstrates His infinite passion for His glory—which is His
righteousness. But what we see is that: (1) God’s glory is upheld;
(2) His wrath is propitiated; (3) the ransom is paid; (4) His
righteousness is demonstrated.
Paul is saying in these verses that when we understand salvation,
justification, and the grounds on which God accepts a person, when
we understand the way that we receive the blessings of justification,
there is no room left for pride, no room left for boasting. Would you
say this: “There was something I did, something I believed, that set
me apart from others, that made me special, that made God bring me into
His Kingdom and not others. In the final analysis, something in me
accounted for my eternal life. I improved the grace given me by
contributing my faith, whereas others failed to do so. I believed and
thereby fulfilled God’s plan, whereas others did not believe and failed
to receive the benefits of God’s gracious offer, and that is why I was
accepted by God”? Paul wants us to understand that our standing with
God has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with anything in us. Faith
corresponds to grace. Work corresponds to debt. Therefore faith excludes
boasting, and work supports boasting. If you are the beneficiary of
grace in all that you are and have, you cannot boast in yourself. 1
Corinthians 4:7 “What have you that you did not receive? If then you
received it, why do you boast as if it were not a gift?” When all is
gift, boasting is excluded. We’ll see more of this in Romans 4.
Paul says in v.28: “a man is justified by faith apart from observing
the law.” This seems to contradict James 2:24: “You see that a person
is justified by what he does and not by faith alone.” How do we
reconcile these statements? Charles Spurgeon said, “There’s no need
to reconcile friends.” Paul is clearly talking about how a man is
accepted by God. He is dealing with the issue of how it can be that
unrighteous people can be accepted by a righteous God. He is
specifically dealing with the issue of the way that we are justified,
declared righteous, pardoned, and accepted. James, however, is talking
about something else. James is writing in the context of dealing with
hypocrisy in the church. There are some people who claim to believe,
claim to be Christians, but their lives do not bear the fruit of their
profession. How do you tell the difference between somebody who claims
to be a Christian but isn’t, and someone who claims to be a Christian
and is? How do you know whether a person really believes? What
demonstrates their Christianity? James answer is clear. “Faith brings
forth the fruit of holiness.” So faith and obedience, holiness, says
James, demonstrates a person to be a believer. See four notes on this
issue:
(1) Paul is dealing with how one is made right before God. James is
dealing with the sin of hypocrisy (see James 2:14). (2) James does
not ask the question, “Can faith alone really save a person?” That’s
not what James is talking about. He’s not asking if real faith by
itself saves a person. James is asking another question: “Can claimed
faith demonstrate a person to really be a Christian?” (3) James is
clearly concerned about what he calls dead faith. There were no deeds
from those claiming to have faith. There was no workmanship for which
we were created in grace as Paul says in Ephesians 2. And so we know
from Ephesians and elsewhere that Paul is clearly concerned about
people who make a profession but show no marks of the regenerating
work of the Holy Spirit. (4) Both James and Paul use Abraham to make
their point: James goes to the story of Abraham in order to prove that
faith without fruit, without deeds, without obedience, without love,
is not real faith. But notice that he gives us a clue. He quotes from
Genesis 15:6 “Abraham believed and God reckoned it to him as
righteousness.” Then he says that Abraham was justified when he offered
up Isaac. Then he draws his conclusion. “So you see that a man is
justified by works and not by faith alone.” Now that’s the clue to
show that he’s not contradicting Paul. When did God say to Abraham
that he was justified by faith? Before Isaac was born. When did Abraham
offer Isaac up? Years and years and years later. Therefore, James knows
that his audience, being good Jewish Christians, knows that God’s
declaration of Abraham as righteous came seven chapters before Abraham
offered up Isaac. James is giving a clue that he is not talking about
God’s acceptance of Abraham; he’s talking about Abraham’s demonstration
that he does belong to God. Over and over James gives clues to help his
audience understand that he is not attempting to contradict what Paul
said. In fact, Paul, in the last verse of Romans 3, acknowledges that
faith and obedience go hand in hand in the Christian life. But Paul
also knows that our obedience has nothing to do with God’s
justification, and he wants us to hold those two truths right together.
There’s no need to reconcile friends. Does God call us to obedience as
Christians? Absolutely. Does our obedience have anything to do
whatsoever with God’s acceptance of us? Absolutely not. And if you
get that wrong, you get everything wrong.
Conditionality inserted into any relationship severs the capacity for
intimacy in that relationship. If you are obeying because you are
afraid of the rejection of God, then you are obeying out of an ungodly
fear. If you are a believer, then God has accepted you in His Son, and
your obedience is not rendered in order to get Him to like you, love
you, and save you. It’s rendered out of gratitude for the salvation
that is already yours. Look quickly in Exodus 20:2-3. The Ten
Commandments are going to be given. Is this another way of salvation
that Moses is suggesting? No. “I am the Lord your God, Who brought
you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery… You shall
have no other gods before Me.” See what God says. He does not say
“Here are the Ten Commandments. If you will obey them, or try really
hard to obey them, then I will bring you out of the land of Egypt,
out of the land of slavery.” That is not what God says. God says,
“I have brought you out of the land of Egypt. I have brought you out
of the house of slavery. I have redeemed you. Now obey.” Redeemed!
Now obey. That’s the order. Not obey in order to be redeemed. Do you
get that? Paul is emphasizing when he says justification is by faith
alone that we are redeemed for obedience, not redeemed by obedience.
And that makes all the difference in the world. My obedience is not
in order to earn the saving love of God. He already loves me more than
I can ever know. My obedience flows from that love which I have
received. That is the greatest news ever told.
…God doesn’t depend on what we do. He depends upon His work and His work
in His Son. On God’s end, salvation is provided by grace. But it’s not
just on God’s end. Our salvation is provided by grace. On our end, our
faith, whereby we receive the grace of God in the gospel, is a gift of
God. He gifts us with faith. So salvation is by grace at both ends:
on God’s end and our end. We don’t do things in order to condition
God’s acceptance of us, and the one thing that God requires of
us—faith—He gives. It goes right back to the prayer of Augustine.
He said to God, “Command what You will and grant what You command.”
In other words, “Lord, command me to do anything You want. And make
me willing and able and certain to do it.”
God in His mercy accepts you not because of something in you, but
because of something in His Son and something that His Son did.
And so when He accepts you, He looks at His Son, not at you. Do
works flow from the work of God in you? Of course they do.
1What advantage, then, is there in being a Jew, or what value is there in circumcision? 2Much in every way! First of all, they have been entrusted with the very words of God.
3What if some did not have faith? Will their lack of faith nullify God's faithfulness? 4Not at all! Let God be true, and every man a liar. As it is written:
"So that you may be proved right when you speak
and prevail when you judge."[1]
5But if our unrighteousness brings out God's righteousness more clearly, what shall we say? That God is unjust in bringing his wrath on us? (I am using a human argument.) 6Certainly not! If that were so, how could God judge the world? 7Someone might argue, "If my falsehood enhances God's truthfulness and so increases his glory, why am I still condemned as a sinner?" 8Why not say--as we are being slanderously reported as saying and as some claim that we say--"Let us do evil that good may result"? Their condemnation is deserved.
9What shall we conclude then? Are we any better[2] ? Not at all! We have already made the charge that Jews and Gentiles alike are all under sin. 10As it is written:
"There is no one righteous, not even one;
11there is no one who understands,
no one who seeks God.
12All have turned away,
they have together become worthless;
there is no one who does good,
not even one."[3]
13"Their throats are open graves;
their tongues practice deceit."[4]
"The poison of vipers is on their lips."[5]
14"Their mouths are full of cursing and bitterness."[6]
15"Their feet are swift to shed blood;
16ruin and misery mark their ways,
17and the way of peace they do not know."[7]
18"There is no fear of God before their eyes."[8]
19Now we know that whatever the law says, it says to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be silenced and the whole world held accountable to God. 20Therefore no one will be declared righteous in his sight by observing the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of sin.
21But now a righteousness from God, apart from law, has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify. 22This righteousness from God comes through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference, 23for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24and are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus. 25God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement,[9] through faith in his blood. He did this to demonstrate his justice, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished-- 26he did it to demonstrate his justice at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus.
27Where, then, is boasting? It is excluded. On what principle? On that of observing the law? No, but on that of faith. 28For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from observing the law. 29Is God the God of Jews only? Is he not the God of Gentiles too? Yes, of Gentiles too, 30since there is only one God, who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through that same faith. 31Do we, then, nullify the law by this faith? Not at all! Rather, we uphold the law.
Footnotes
Bible text from
Gospelcom.net. Copyright 1973, 1978, 1984 by
International Bible Society.
BACK TO MENU PREVIOUS CHAPTER NEXT CHAPTER